Your Roadmap to CMMC Success: DataSure24’s 12-Month Readiness Program
Your Roadmap to CMMC Success: DataSure24’s 12-Month Readiness Program The clock is ticking for defense contractors. With CMMC requirements becoming mandatory in DoD contracts, the question isn’t whether you need to achieve compliance—it’s how quickly and efficiently you can get there. Many organizations look at CMMC’s 110 practices (and 320 assessment objectives) and feel overwhelmed. Where do you start? What comes first? How do you ensure nothing falls through the cracks? That’s exactly why DataSure24 developed our structured 12-Month CMMC Readiness Program—a proven roadmap that transforms the complex journey to certification into a manageable, milestone-based process. Why a 12-Month Roadmap Matters CMMC compliance isn’t just about checking boxes. It’s about building a mature cybersecurity program that genuinely protects Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) while meeting DoD requirements. This transformation doesn’t happen overnight. Consider what’s at stake: Organizations that can’t demonstrate CMMC compliance won’t be eligible for DoD contracts. As Mike Turpin from EC First emphasized in a recent webinar, “You cannot be awarded a contract without the certification in hand.” No certification means watching contracts go to your competitors. But here’s the challenge: Most organizations need 9-12 months of preparation before they’re ready for assessment. Add the 8-week assessment process itself, and you’re looking at a significant timeline. Starting today isn’t early—it’s essential. A structured roadmap ensures you: Address requirements in logical order, building on each milestone Avoid costly rework from implementing controls out of sequence Maintain momentum with clear monthly objectives Have evidence and documentation ready when assessors arrive Transform compliance from a sprint into a sustainable program Your Month-by-Month Journey to CMMC Certification Our 12-month program breaks down CMMC readiness into 20 manageable milestones, each building upon the last. Here’s how your transformation unfolds: Month 1: Foundation (Milestones 1-2) Define CUI & Define Scope Everything starts here. You can’t protect what you haven’t identified. This critical first month focuses on: Identifying exactly what constitutes CUI in your environment based on contracts Creating comprehensive data flow diagrams showing where CUI travels Inventorying all assets and applications (both in-scope and out) Developing network diagrams for CUI storage, transmission, and processing Identifying third-party service providers handling your CUI Without proper scoping, you risk either over-engineering (wasting resources) or under-protecting (failing assessment). Month 2: Documentation Framework (Milestone 3) Documentation Development With scope defined, we build your documentation foundation: Creating policies and standards addressing all CMMC Level 2 requirements Beginning your System Security Plan (SSP)—the “card catalog” for your entire program Establishing your Plan of Action & Milestones (POA&M) to track remediation Remember: Draft policies won’t pass assessment. Every document needs formal approval and specific, actionable language. Month 3: Architecture & Network (Milestones 4-5) Secure Architecture & Network Security Now we fortify your technical foundation: Implementing network architecture based on secure engineering principles Creating protective enclaves for sensitive information Developing and implementing comprehensive network security practices Documenting all procedures and tracking deficiencies in your POA&M Month 4: Configuration Management (Milestones 6-7) Baseline Security Configurations & Centralized Controls Standardization is key to maintainable security: Building secure baseline configurations for all technology platforms Implementing hardening standards across your environment Developing Group Policy Objects (GPOs) for Active Directory Ensuring consistent security controls across all systems Month 5: Access & Change Control (Milestones 8-9) Identity Management & Change Management Controlling who can do what—and when changes happen: Implementing Identity & Access Management (IAM) with least privilege Establishing Role-Based Access Control (RBAC) across systems Creating formal change control processes Establishing a Change Control Board (CCB) for governance Month 6: System Protection (Milestones 10-11) Maintenance & Endpoint Protection Keeping systems secure requires ongoing attention: Developing proactive maintenance practices and procedures Deploying endpoint protection to all in-scope assets Configuring protection according to organizational policies Ensuring comprehensive coverage without gaps Month 7: Vulnerability Management (Milestones 12-13) Vulnerability/Patch Management & Personnel Security Addressing both technical and human vulnerabilities: Building a vulnerability management program for identification and remediation Establishing patch management procedures and timelines Working with HR to integrate personnel security requirements Ensuring background checks and security awareness are embedded in operations Month 8: Data Protection (Milestones 14-15) Encryption & Physical Security Protecting CUI requires multiple layers: Implementing cryptographic key management systems Deploying data encryption for CUI at rest and in transit Establishing physical security controls for facilities and media Documenting all protective measures and procedures Month 9: Monitoring & Media (Milestones 16-17) Situational Awareness & System Media Handling Visibility and control over your environment: Implementing log collection and analysis capabilities (SIEM) Establishing situational awareness through continuous monitoring Creating secure procedures for media containing CUI Managing everything from USB drives to backup tapes to printed documents Month 10: Response & Training (Milestones 18-19) Incident Response & Security Awareness Preparing your people and processes: Developing incident response capabilities to detect, respond, and recover Creating incident response plans and playbooks Building security awareness training programs Ensuring your workforce understands their role in protecting CUI Month 11 & 12: Validation (Milestone 20) Internal Audit & Risk Assessment The final push to certification readiness: Conducting comprehensive security assessments Performing risk assessments of all controls Validating evidence and documentation Ensuring your SPRS score accurately reflects your security posture Addressing any remaining POA&M items The Benefits of Following a Structured Plan This milestone-based approach delivers several critical advantages: Logical Progression: Each milestone builds on previous achievements. You won’t find yourself implementing advanced controls before basic foundations are in place. Resource Optimization: By following a proven sequence, you avoid costly rework and redundant efforts. Your team knows exactly what to focus on each month. Continuous Validation: Regular milestones mean regular validation. You’ll catch issues early when they’re easier and less expensive to fix. Evidence Development: Documentation and evidence collection happen throughout the journey, not in a last-minute scramble before assessment. Sustainable Compliance: This isn’t about passing a test—it’s about building a security program that protects your business and maintains compliance long-term. How DataSure24 Accelerates Your Success While the roadmap provides structure, success requires expertise. DataSure24’s approach includes: Bi-weekly Joint Security Meetings (JSMs): Regular touchpoints ensure consistent progress and rapid issue
5 “Unreadiness” Traps That Will Fail Your CMMC Assessment
5 “Unreadiness” Traps That Will Fail Your CMMC Assessment 45% of organizations fail their first CMMC assessment. That’s not a typo. Nearly half of all companies pursuing Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification don’t make it through on their first attempt. And here’s what makes this statistic even more striking: these organizations aren’t failing because they didn’t try hard enough. They’re failing because they walked straight into one or more “unreadiness” traps—critical oversights that quietly undermine months of preparation. The difference between passing and failing your CMMC assessment often comes down to avoiding these five specific pitfalls. Understanding them now could save your organization from joining that 45%. Trap #1: “Draft” Policies & Vague Language Your policies are the foundation of your CMMC compliance—but if they’re still stamped “DRAFT” or filled with vague language, you’re setting yourself up for failure before the assessment even begins. Assessors see draft policies as immediate red flags. These documents signal that your organization hasn’t fully committed to its security practices. Every policy must be finalized, formally approved, and include specific dates. No exceptions. But finalization alone isn’t enough. The language within your policies matters just as much. Consider this common mistake: a policy that states “Use strong password policies.” What exactly does “strong” mean? To whom does this apply? When should it be enforced? Compare that to actionable language: “All system passwords must meet the following complexity standards: minimum 8 characters, including at least one uppercase letter, one number, and one special character. Password changes are required every 90 days for all users with CUI access.” The second example leaves no room for interpretation. It tells employees exactly what’s expected and gives assessors clear criteria to verify. When your policies simply regurgitate CMMC requirements without adding specificity, you’re essentially telling assessors you haven’t thought through implementation. Key takeaway: Every policy needs to be formally approved with clear approval dates and signatures. Replace vague directives with specific, measurable requirements that align directly with CMMC objectives. Trap #2: Your Documentation Doesn’t Match Reality This trap catches more organizations than any other: what you’ve documented doesn’t align with what you’ve actually implemented. It’s the cybersecurity equivalent of saying one thing and doing another—and assessors will catch it every time. The most common documentation mismatches that fail assessments include: Security tool discrepancies: Your SSP states you’re using Windows Defender, but assessors find Symantec installed across your environment Incomplete inventory counts: Documentation lists 18 systems, but your actual inventory shows only 10—or worse, shows 25 Partial control implementation: Your Office 365 lockout policies are perfectly documented, but on-premise systems are completely ignored Platform-specific oversights: BitLocker documentation covers Windows perfectly but forgets about Linux machines in development User list misalignments: The SSP’s authorized user list doesn’t match Active Directory, and Linux system users aren’t documented at all Missing scope elements: Documentation addresses cloud environments while overlooking critical on-premise infrastructure Each discrepancy raises the same question in an assessor’s mind: “What else doesn’t match?” These inconsistencies compound quickly, transforming minor oversights into major compliance failures. The root cause is often simple: documentation gets created in a vacuum, separate from the teams actually implementing security controls. By the time of assessment, your documented ideal and operational reality have drifted apart. Key takeaway: Conduct regular reconciliation between your documentation and actual implementation. Every system, every control, every user listed in your documentation must reflect current reality—not aspirational goals or outdated information. Trap #3: Misunderstanding Shared Responsibility Using cloud services doesn’t mean you can wash your hands of security responsibilities. Yet many organizations make the critical error of thinking “it’s in the cloud, so it’s not my problem.” This fundamental misunderstanding of shared responsibility will derail your assessment. Here’s what catches organizations off guard: even when using FedRAMP-authorized cloud providers, you retain significant security obligations. That Customer Responsibility Matrix (CRM) from your provider isn’t just another document to file away—it’s your roadmap for understanding exactly what you must handle versus what your provider covers. The confusion often starts with language. When a cloud provider says they’re “responsible” for infrastructure security, organizations interpret this as “not applicable” to their own compliance. Wrong. You’re still responsible—you’re just outsourcing the implementation. As an assessor noted in the webinar, “It is applicable for the OSC. You’re just hiring someone else to do the work for you.” This misunderstanding cascades into other problems. Organizations inherit controls from their cloud provider but forget about their on-premise systems. They assume cloud-based vulnerability scanning covers everything, neglecting their local servers. They document what the provider does but skip their own responsibilities entirely. Without a properly completed CRM that clearly delineates responsibilities, assessors can’t determine whether you’ve adequately protected CUI across your entire environment. Key takeaway: Your Customer Responsibility Matrix is not optional. Map every CMMC requirement to either your organization or your service provider, ensuring no gaps exist. Remember: “inherited” doesn’t mean “ignored.” Trap #4: An Incorrect or Bloated Scope Scoping might seem like a preliminary exercise, but as one lead assessor emphasized: “Scoping will make or break an assessment.” Draw your boundaries wrong, and you’ll either drown in unnecessary work or leave critical gaps in your compliance. Organizations typically fall into one of two scoping pitfalls, each with its own devastating consequences: Over-scoping paralysis: Including every system “just to be safe” creates exponential work and failure points Under-scoping blindness: Missing systems that handle CUI creates automatic assessment failure Asset misclassification: Incorrectly categorizing CUI assets, security protection assets, or specialized assets Forgotten systems: That old server, backup system, or “temporary” development environment that somehow handles production data Boundary confusion: Unclear delineation between in-scope and out-of-scope environments Contractor system oversight: Failing to include systems used by subcontractors who access your CUI The challenge intensifies when dealing with different asset types required for CMMC Level 2. Each misclassification compounds into more work, more evidence requirements, and more opportunities for failure. Getting scope right requires asking hard questions: Where exactly does CUI flow? Which systems truly need to be included? What can be legitimately excluded? The
“The Card Catalog”: Why Your System Security Plan (SSP) is the Key to CMMC Success
The Card Catalog: Why Your System Security Plan (SSP) Is the Key to CMMC Success Picture walking into an old library. You need a specific book, but there are thousands of volumes spread across multiple floors. Without the card catalog, you’d spend hours — maybe days — searching. Now imagine a CMMC assessor walking into your organization without a properly structured system security plan (SSP). The result? A lengthy, painful assessment that could have been avoided. Your SSP isn’t just another compliance document gathering dust on a shelf. It’s the card catalog for your entire security program — and according to industry experts, it’s the single most critical factor determining whether your CMMC assessment succeeds or fails. What an Assessor Really Wants To See During a recent DataSure24 webinar, Lead Assessor Mike Turpin revealed a fundamental truth about CMMC assessments: “Point my eyes where you want them to go.” This simple statement contains profound wisdom. Assessors aren’t looking to fail organizations. They’re not hunting for problems or trying to make your life difficult. They’re following a structured process with 320 assessment objectives for CMMC Level 2 — and they need your help to navigate efficiently through your evidence. As Mark Musone, DataSure24’s CTO, explains, “As an assessor, I go to that SSP first and foremost, not necessarily finding the answer… but I’m reading the SSP to give me the guidance of where to look for evidence so I can mark it as met.” The difference between a smooth assessment and a disaster often comes down to how well your SSP functions as that navigational tool. When assessors can quickly locate the evidence they need, they spend more time analyzing your actual security controls and less time playing detective. Common SSP Failures That Doom Assessments The statistics are sobering: Approximately 40%-45% of CMMC assessments don’t even make it past phase one. Another 25% fail during the actual assessment. Many of these failures trace directly back to SSP problems. Being Too Generic The most common mistake? SSPs that simply regurgitate CMMC requirements without explaining how the organization actually meets them. “I have seen more often than I want to admit organizations with policies that simply regurgitate the requirement,” Turpin notes. Presenting a PowerPoint Instead of a Real Plan One assessor shared a cringe-worthy example: “I had someone come to my desk not long ago and give me what was literally a 20-slide PowerPoint. And he said, ‘Here’s my SSP. This tells you about my entire environment.’” A PowerPoint presentation isn’t an SSP. It lacks the detail, structure, and evidence mapping that assessors need to validate your compliance. Failing To Link to Actual Evidence Your SSP must connect directly to supporting documentation. If you claim employees must complete five requirements for system access, you’d better have evidence for all five —not just one. Assessors will ask for proof of everything you document. Including Irrelevant or Outdated Content Here’s a counterintuitive truth: Saying too much can be as damaging as saying too little. Musone shared an example where an organization claimed no mobile devices were in scope, then spent two paragraphs describing their mobile device management program. “If you’re gonna say there’s nothing in scope, that’s all you need to say,” he emphasizes. The “Don’t Make Me Dig” Principle Turpin uses a powerful analogy: “The last thing you want during any kind of assessment is an assessor to start digging. You want to set it up very, very simply so that you direct that assessor’s eyes where you want them to go to see what you want them to see.” Why? Because when assessors dig, they find things. Things you might not want them to find. Inconsistencies. Outdated procedures. Gaps you didn’t know existed. Consider this practical example from the field: An SSP should tell assessors exactly where to find evidence for each control. “Within the access control policy, AC level one 3.1.1 is covered on page seven, paragraph three, line seven through nine,” Turpin suggests. This level of precision transforms an eight-week assessment from an excavation project into a verification exercise. The math is compelling. With roughly seven minutes per practice for assessment, do you want assessors spending six minutes hunting for evidence and one minute analyzing it? Or would you prefer they spend one minute locating evidence and six minutes giving your controls the thorough review they deserve? Building Your CMMC Success Foundation Your SSP should be “a consolidation, iteration, and itemization of your entire security program,” according to Musone. Everything in it should already exist somewhere else — user lists, network diagrams, policies, procedures. The SSP simply consolidates these elements into one cohesive document that tells your security story. Here’s what makes an effective SSP: Clear Navigation: Like that library card catalog, it should point to exactly where evidence lives Comprehensive Coverage: Address all 320 assessment objectives, not just the 110 practices Appropriate Detail: Answer the requirement fully without overwhelming with irrelevant information Current and Accurate: Ensure documented controls match actual implementation Evidence Mapping: Link every claim to verifiable proof Remember, you’re not being assessed on just 110 practices — you’re being assessed on 320 objectives. Organizations that prepare only at the practice level find themselves “woefully unprepared,” as the experts warn. Version Control and Maintenance An often-overlooked aspect of SSP management is proper version control. Your SSP isn’t a one-time document — it’s a living record that must evolve with your security program. Implement a formal change management process that tracks every modification, who made it, and why. This discipline becomes critical during assessments when questions arise about control implementation timelines. The External Provider Trap Many organizations fall into what experts call the “external provider trap.” They assume that using a FedRAMP-certified cloud provider automatically satisfies their CMMC obligations. The reality? You remain responsible for understanding and documenting the shared responsibility model. Your SSP must clearly delineate which controls your provider handles and — crucially — which ones remain your responsibility. Consistency Across Environments One of the most common
CMMC 2.0 Enforcement Is Here: What Defense Contractors Must Know Before November 10
CMMC 2.0 Enforcement Is Here: What Defense Contractors Must Know Before November 10 The waiting is over. On September 10, 2025, CFR 48 was published in the Federal Register, officially setting November 10, 2025, as the start of CMMC 2.0 Phase 1 enforcement. For defense contractors, this isn’t just another compliance deadline — it’s a fundamental shift in how the Department of Defense will award contracts. The message is clear: no CMMC certificate, no bid. Understanding CMMC 2.0 and CFR 48 The Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC) 2.0 represents the DoD’s answer to years of ineffective self-attestation under NIST SP 800-171. While contractors have been required to protect controlled unclassified information (CUI) since 2017, enforcement has been minimal and inconsistent. CFR 48 changes that reality permanently. Under the new rule, contracting officers gain the authority — and obligation — to include CMMC requirements in solicitations and awards starting November 10. This isn’t a soft launch or pilot program. Once enforcement begins, CMMC compliance becomes as essential as having a CAGE code or DUNS number. The framework establishes three levels of certification: Most manufacturers handling CUI will require Level 2 certification from a Third Party Assessment Organization (C3PAO). Self-assessment options may exist for some Level 1 and 2 contracts initially, but the DoD has made clear these are temporary measures, not long-term strategies. The Impact on Defense Contractors Immediate Contract Implications Starting November 10, defense contractors will encounter CMMC requirements in new solicitations. The DoD has indicated that adoption will be progressive but swift. Prime contractors should expect CMMC clauses in virtually all new contracts involving CUI by early 2026. For small and medium manufacturers — the backbone of the defense supply chain — this creates an existential challenge. Unlike large primes with dedicated compliance teams, smaller contractors must achieve the same certification standards with limited resources. A machine shop with 75 employees faces the same 110 controls as a billion-dollar aerospace firm. The Flow-Down Effect DFARS 252.204-7020 mandates that prime contractors flow down CMMC requirements to all subcontractors handling CUI. This creates a cascade effect throughout the defense industrial base. If you’re a Tier 2 or Tier 3 supplier, your prime contractor will demand proof of CMMC compliance — or find suppliers who can provide it. We’re already seeing forward-thinking primes vetting their supply chains. Those unable to demonstrate clear paths to certification are being replaced. By waiting, contractors risk not just future opportunities but existing relationships. The Assessment Bottleneck Perhaps the most overlooked risk is assessment capacity. With fewer than 100 accredited C3PAOs currently authorized to perform assessments, and each Level 2 assessment requiring weeks to complete, simple math reveals a looming crisis. Thousands of contractors need certification, but there are only a handful of assessors to provide it. Early movers are already booking assessments for Q1 2026. Those who wait until the November deadline approaches may find themselves in an impossible position: ready for assessment but unable to schedule one before critical contract deadlines. Critical Steps for Immediate Action 1. Define Your CMMC Scope Before anything else, understand what needs protection. Many contractors overscope their environments, dramatically increasing costs and complexity. Proper scoping involves: This foundational step often reveals that CUI touches more systems than expected — or conversely, that strategic segmentation can significantly reduce compliance burden. 2. Conduct an Honest Gap Assessment Hoping you’re compliant isn’t a strategy. A thorough gap assessment against CMMC Level 2 requirements will reveal the true magnitude of work required. Common gaps include: Document every gap in a formal Plan of Action and Milestones (POA&M). C3PAO assessors will expect to see not just current compliance, but evidence of how you identified and remediated deficiencies. 3. Build Your Evidence Repository CMMC assessment isn’t just about having controls — it’s about proving they exist and function. Begin collecting: This evidence collection often takes months. Starting now means avoiding the pre-assessment scramble that derails many certification efforts. 4. Secure Your Assessment Partner With C3PAO capacity already constrained, establishing a relationship now is critical. But choose carefully — not all C3PAOs are equal. Look for: The right partner guides you through preparation, not just assessment. The Cost of Inaction Some contractors still hope for delays or exceptions. This is dangerous thinking. The DoD has invested too much in CMMC to go back on it now. CFR 48’s publication ended years of speculation — enforcement is happening. The mathematics of noncompliance are stark. Miss CMMC requirements on one contract, and you’re disqualified. As CMMC adoption accelerates through 2026, noncompliant contractors will find themselves locked out of the entire defense market. For many small manufacturers, this means choosing between certification costs today or business extinction tomorrow. DataSure24: Your Path to CMMC Compliance At DataSure24, we’ve guided dozens of manufacturers through successful CMMC preparation. Our Lead CCAs and provisional instructors understand both the technical requirements and the business realities facing defense contractors. Our proven approach includes: The November 10 deadline isn’t negotiable, but your readiness timeline is still within your control. Every day of delay increases risk and reduces options. Ready to secure your defense contracts? Contact DataSure24 today for a complimentary CMMC readiness consultation. Let’s ensure November 10 marks your competitive advantage, not your compliance crisis. For more information about CMMC requirements and DataSure24’s certification services, visit https://datasure24.com/services/ or call 716-600-3724. Posted by Mark Musone
The Allianz Life Breach: Why Third-Party Vendor Risk Just Became Your Biggest Security Threat
When hackers stole 1.1 million customer records from insurance giant Allianz Life in July 2025, they didn’t break through firewalls or exploit zero-day vulnerabilities. Instead, they simply asked for access—and got it. This breach represents a seismic shift in how sophisticated threat actors are targeting enterprises, and it carries critical lessons for businesses across manufacturing, healthcare, and financial services. The Anatomy of a Modern Breach On July 16, 2025, threat actors gained access to Allianz Life’s third-party cloud-based CRM system, exposing sensitive personal information including names, addresses, phone numbers, dates of birth, and Tax Identification Numbers. The breach affected the majority of Allianz Life’s 1.4 million customers, along with data from financial professionals and select employees. What makes this breach particularly alarming is its simplicity. The ShinyHunters group, linked to this attack, used social engineering tactics to trick employees into connecting a malicious OAuth application to the company’s Salesforce instance. No complex malware. No sophisticated network infiltration. Just human manipulation and a few clicks. Why This Changes Everything The Death of Perimeter Security Traditional cybersecurity focused on building walls around your data. This breach proves those walls are meaningless when attackers can simply convince someone to open the door. The Allianz Life incident highlights three critical realities: The Supply Chain Multiplier Effect For manufacturers dealing with CMMC compliance, this breach should trigger immediate concern. The same tactics used against Allianz Life are being deployed across the defense industrial base. When one contractor falls, it creates a ripple effect throughout the supply chain. Your secure practices mean nothing if your vendors provide an open door to attackers. Community banks and credit unions face similar challenges. With limited IT resources and increasing reliance on third-party financial technology providers, a single compromised vendor can expose multiple institutions simultaneously. Industry-Specific Implications Manufacturing and CMMC Compliance Defense contractors working toward CMMC Level 2 certification must now reconsider their vendor management strategies. The 110 security controls required for certification specifically address supply chain risk, but many organizations focus solely on their internal controls while ignoring vendor vulnerabilities. Key considerations for manufacturers: Healthcare and HIPAA Security Healthcare organizations already struggling with ransomware attacks now face an additional threat vector. The same social engineering tactics that compromised Allianz Life are being adapted to target electronic health record systems and practice management platforms. The implications are severe: Financial Services and Vendor Risk Management For community banks and credit unions, this breach underscores the critical importance of vendor risk management programs. Recent OCC and FDIC examinations have increased focus on third-party oversight, and incidents like this validate regulatory concerns. Financial institutions must consider: What Makes ShinyHunters Different The ShinyHunters group represents a new breed of threat actor. Rather than relying on technical exploits, they’ve mastered the art of social engineering at scale. Their tactics include: This group has been linked to breaches at major companies including AT&T, Ticketmaster, and now Allianz Life. Their success rate suggests current security awareness training isn’t addressing these specific attack vectors. Immediate Actions for Protection 1. Audit Third-Party Access Today Don’t wait for a breach notification. Every organization should immediately: 2. Implement Zero-Trust Vendor Management The days of trusting vendors by default are over. Implement: 3. Revolutionize Security Awareness Training Traditional phishing simulations aren’t enough. Your training must evolve to address: 4. Strengthen CRM Security Controls Whether using Salesforce, HubSpot, or another platform: The Path Forward: Building Resilience The Allianz Life breach isn’t an isolated incident—it’s a preview of the new normal. As organizations continue migrating to cloud platforms and expanding vendor relationships, the attack surface grows exponentially. Building resilience requires a fundamental shift in how we approach security. Organizations must move beyond compliance checkboxes to embrace continuous security improvement. This means regular assessments, proactive threat hunting, and a security culture that extends to every employee and vendor relationship. How DataSure24 Can Help At DataSure24, we’ve helped hundreds of organizations strengthen their security posture against these evolving threats. Our approach combines: Don’t wait for your organization to become the next headline. The threat landscape has fundamentally changed, and your security strategy must evolve accordingly. Ready to protect your organization against the next Allianz Life-style breach? Contact DataSure24 for a complimentary Security Strategy Review. Let’s ensure your vendors strengthen your security—not compromise it. Posted by Mark Musone
CMMC 2.0 is Here – Cybersecurity is No Longer Optional for DIB Contractors
The defense contracting landscape has reached a critical inflection point. With the official rollout of Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC) 2.0, the Department of Defense has sent a clear message: cybersecurity compliance is no longer a suggestion—it’s a mandatory requirement for all Defense Industrial Base (DIB) contractors.For aerospace and defense manufacturers, this shift represents both an immediate challenge and a defining moment. The days of treating cybersecurity as a secondary concern are over. Your ability to protect sensitive defense information now directly determines your eligibility to compete for federal contracts. The New Reality: What CMMC 2.0 Means for Your Business CMMC 2.0 fundamentally changes how defense contractors approach cybersecurity. Unlike previous self-attestation models, this framework requires third-party verification of your security practices. Here’s what this means for your organization: Mandatory Certification Requirements Direct Business Impact Without CMMC certification, your organization cannot: The Cost of Non-Compliance Goes Beyond Lost Contracts While losing access to federal opportunities is the most immediate consequence, the ripple effects of non-compliance extend much further: Financial Impact: For many manufacturers with revenues between $10-200 million, federal contracts represent a significant portion of their business. Losing this revenue stream can threaten organizational stability. Why Immediate Action is Critical The CMMC certification process isn’t something that can be rushed. Organizations typically need 6-12 months to prepare for assessment, depending on their current cybersecurity maturity. With contracts already requiring certification, waiting means watching opportunities pass by. Consider these timeline realities: Every day of delay pushes your certification date further out, potentially costing millions in lost contract opportunities. Turning Compliance into Competitive Advantage While CMMC 2.0 presents challenges, forward-thinking organizations are discovering unexpected benefits: Your Path to CMMC Certification Success Achieving CMMC certification doesn’t have to be overwhelming. The key is partnering with experts who understand both the technical requirements and the practical realities of implementation. Here’s the strategic approach that works: Why DataSure24 Makes the Difference At DataSure24, we bring unique advantages to your CMMC journey: Don’t Let CMMC Become a Barrier—Make It Your Advantage The message from the DoD is clear: cybersecurity is now the price of admission for federal contracting. Organizations that act decisively will not only maintain their current contracts but position themselves for growth in an increasingly security-conscious market. The question isn’t whether you need CMMC certification—it’s how quickly you can achieve it. Every day without certification is a day your competitors gain ground. Ready to secure your federal contracting future? DataSure24 is here to transform CMMC compliance from an obstacle into your competitive edge. Our proven process, deep expertise, and practical approach ensure you achieve certification efficiently and effectively. Schedule Your Free CMMC Readiness Consultation Don’t wait for the next contract opportunity to pass you by. Take the first step toward CMMC certification today and ensure your organization remains competitive in the evolving defense industrial base. Posted by Mark Musone
Ask the Lead CCA: Your Direct Line to CMMC Expertise
In the complex world of defense contracting, one question echoes through boardrooms and compliance departments alike: “How do we navigate CMMC requirements without losing our minds — or our contracts?” At DataSure24, we’ve heard this question countless times. That’s why we created Ask the Lead CCA — a direct connection to Mark Musone, our CTO and one of the industry’s foremost CMMC experts. This isn’t just another consulting service. It’s your opportunity to cut through the confusion and get straight answers from someone who lives and breathes CMMC every day. Why CMMC Guidance Matters More Than Ever The Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC) has fundamentally changed how defense contractors approach cybersecurity. Gone are the days of self-attestation and flexible interpretations. Today’s reality demands concrete compliance, verified practices, and a clear understanding of what the Department of Defense expects from its supply chain. For organizations with 50-500 employees — particularly those in aerospace, defense manufacturing, and related industries — the challenge is especially acute. You’re large enough to have significant DoD contracts at stake, yet often lack the dedicated compliance teams of larger corporations. Every decision matters, every investment counts, and every delay could mean lost opportunities. This is where expert guidance becomes invaluable. The difference between understanding CMMC requirements and truly comprehending how to implement them efficiently can save months of effort and hundreds of thousands of dollars in misdirected investments. Meet Your Lead CCA: Mark Musone Mark Musone isn’t just another consultant with opinions about CMMC. As DataSure24’s CTO, he brings a unique combination of technical expertise, regulatory insight, and practical experience to every conversation. His credentials speak volumes: But credentials only tell part of the story. What makes Mark truly valuable is his ability to translate complex requirements into actionable strategies. He doesn’t just explain what CMMC requires — he shows you how to achieve it efficiently, practically, and cost-effectively. The Gold Mine of a 30-Minute Session Why do we call a session with Mark a “gold mine” of education? Because in just 30 minutes, you gain insights that would take months to acquire through self-study and trial-and-error. Here’s what makes these sessions transformative: Unparalleled Expertise That Cuts Through the Noise CMMC documentation can be overwhelming. Between NIST 800-171 requirements, assessment guides, and evolving interpretations, it’s easy to get lost in the details. Mark’s extensive experience means he can quickly identify what matters most for your specific situation. Instead of wading through hundreds of pages of technical documentation, you get targeted insights that apply directly to your organization. Time-Saving Strategies Based on Real-World Experience Every organization wants to avoid the common pitfalls that delay certification or increase costs. Mark has seen what works and what doesn’t across dozens of implementations. He can help you: This isn’t theoretical knowledge — it’s practical wisdom gained from working with organizations just like yours. Cost-Efficiency Through Strategic Planning One of the biggest mistakes organizations make is throwing money at CMMC compliance without a clear strategy. They purchase expensive tools that don’t address their actual gaps, hire consultants who don’t understand their business, or implement processes that create more problems than they solve. Mark’s guidance helps you invest wisely. By understanding your current state and your specific requirements, he can help you create a road map that maximizes your existing investments while identifying where new resources are truly needed. Practical, Real-World Insights You Can Implement Theory is important, but implementation is everything. Mark doesn’t just talk about what CMMC requires — he shares practical strategies that organizations have successfully used to achieve compliance. These real-world examples help you understand not just the “what” but the “how” of CMMC implementation. Common Questions, Clear Answers Through Ask the Lead CCA, organizations gain clarity on the questions that keep them up at night: “Which CMMC level actually applies to our contracts?” Understanding your requirements is the first step toward efficient compliance. Mark helps you interpret contract language and determine your true obligations. “How do we navigate the assessment and certification process?” The path to certification involves multiple steps, stakeholders, and decisions. Get a clear road map tailored to your timeline and resources. “What’s a realistic timeline for our compliance journey?” Every organization is different. Mark helps you build a timeline that balances urgency with practicality. “Where should we invest our limited resources first?” Not all controls are created equal. Learn which areas deserve immediate attention and which can be addressed over time. “How do we avoid the pitfalls that delay certification?” Learn from others’ mistakes without making them yourself. Mark shares insights from successful certifications and common stumbling blocks. “How can we turn CMMC compliance into a competitive advantage?” Forward-thinking organizations see CMMC as more than a requirement — it’s an opportunity to strengthen their market position. Who Benefits Most from Ask the Lead CCA? While any organization facing CMMC requirements can benefit from expert guidance, certain groups find these sessions particularly valuable: Take the First Step Today CMMC compliance isn’t optional for defense contractors — it’s a business imperative. The question isn’t whether you need to achieve compliance, but how efficiently and effectively you can get there. Ask the Lead CCA provides the expert guidance that makes the difference between struggling through compliance and strategically achieving it. Don’t let CMMC complexity slow your momentum. Whether you’re just beginning to explore requirements or deep into implementation challenges, Mark Musone is ready to provide the clarity and direction you need. Book 30 min FREE with a LEAD CCA Transform CMMC from an obstacle into your competitive advantage. Your compliance journey starts with a single conversation. Posted by Mark Musone
Is Your Network Truly Secure? The Truth About Penetration Testing
Despite increased cybersecurity investments, security breaches continue to make headlines. The challenge is clear: too many organizations struggle to operationalize security effectively, leaving them vulnerable to evolving threats. At DataSure24, we believe cybersecurity should work for you—not against you. For businesses across manufacturing, healthcare, and financial services, the question isn’t whether you need better security—it’s whether your current defenses can withstand a real attack. Penetration testing provides the answer, revealing vulnerabilities before attackers find them. Understanding Penetration Testing Penetration testing, or pen testing, is like a controlled fire drill for your cybersecurity. It’s a simulated cyberattack carried out by experts to uncover weaknesses in your systems, networks, or applications. Unlike waiting for an actual breach to expose your vulnerabilities, pen testing proactively identifies security gaps while you still have time to fix them. This approach differs fundamentally from other security measures. While firewalls and antivirus software play defense, penetration testing actively challenges those defenses. Security professionals use the same techniques as malicious hackers, but with your permission and for your benefit. They attempt to breach your systems, documenting every vulnerability discovered along the way. The process reveals not just technical vulnerabilities but also procedural weaknesses. A pen test might expose that your employees fall for phishing emails, your access controls have loopholes, or your incident response procedures need improvement. This comprehensive view helps organizations understand their true security posture beyond what automated scans can reveal. Why Penetration Testing Is Essential Unlike reactive measures that respond after incidents occur, pen testing takes a proactive stance. This approach delivers several key benefits that make it indispensable for modern businesses: Organizations often discover they’re more vulnerable than expected. Systems considered secure reveal exploitable flaws. Networks thought to be properly segmented show unexpected connections. These discoveries, while sometimes alarming, provide invaluable opportunities to strengthen defenses before real attackers strike. The Frequency Question: Annual or Bi-Annual Testing? Your IT environment is constantly evolving. New applications, system updates, and emerging threats continuously reshape your attack surface. What was secure six months ago may be vulnerable today. This dynamic nature of technology infrastructure drives the need for regular penetration testing. Regular testing is essential for several reasons: Many organizations find that annual testing provides a good baseline, while bi-annual testing offers better protection for rapidly changing environments or those handling particularly sensitive data. The right frequency depends on your industry, compliance requirements, and risk tolerance. DataSure24’s Five-Step Penetration Testing Methodology DataSure24’s penetration testing follows a proven five-step methodology designed to uncover vulnerabilities systematically and thoroughly: 1. Planning Define scope, boundaries, and the best approach for testing. This phase ensures testing aligns with your business objectives while avoiding disruption to normal operations. Clear communication protocols and authorization procedures protect both parties throughout the engagement. 2. Discovery & Identification Enumerate assets, ports, and services through scanning and manual information gathering. This reconnaissance phase maps your attack surface, identifying all potential entry points an attacker might exploit. Both automated tools and manual techniques ensure comprehensive coverage. 3. Vulnerability Assessment Analyze information to create an exploitation plan. Not all vulnerabilities are equal—this phase prioritizes findings based on exploitability and potential impact. The assessment considers both technical vulnerabilities and business context. 4. Exploitation Illustrate the true risk that vulnerabilities present to your network. Controlled exploitation demonstrates what attackers could accomplish, moving beyond theoretical risks to show actual impact. This phase provides concrete evidence of security gaps. 5. Reporting Provide detailed findings with executive summary and actionable recommendations. Clear documentation ensures both technical teams and business leaders understand the findings. Prioritized recommendations guide remediation efforts effectively. Common Findings Revealed Through Penetration Testing This systematic approach consistently reveals several categories of vulnerabilities across organizations: These findings often surprise organizations that believed their security was adequate. The concrete evidence from penetration testing makes the case for security improvements much more compelling than abstract risk assessments. Why Choose DataSure24? At DataSure24, we believe cybersecurity should work for you—not against you. Our mission is to simplify security, integrating robust solutions seamlessly into your operations. This philosophy drives our approach to penetration testing and all our security services. Our team understands that penetration testing isn’t just about finding vulnerabilities—it’s about helping organizations improve their security posture effectively and efficiently. Take Action Before It’s Too Late A data breach can cost millions and damage your reputation permanently. Pen testing helps you close gaps before they lead to catastrophic incidents. From customer data to financial records, your business holds valuable information—ensure it stays safe and secure. The cost of penetration testing pales in comparison to the potential losses from a successful attack. Beyond financial losses, breaches damage customer trust, trigger regulatory penalties, and disrupt operations. Investing in penetration testing now prevents these devastating consequences later. Don’t wait for an incident to reveal your vulnerabilities. Proactive testing provides the insights needed to strengthen defenses while you still have control over the timeline and approach. Start Your Security Journey Today Ready to fortify your defenses? Contact DataSure24 today to schedule your penetration test and take the first step toward cybersecurity peace of mind. Our team is ready to help you understand your current security posture and develop a plan for improvement. Book a call with our Chief Strategy Officer, Mike Byrne, to discuss your specific needs and how penetration testing fits into your overall security strategy. Every organization’s situation is unique, and we’ll work with you to develop an approach that makes sense for your business. Posted by Mark Musone
Stay Ahead of HIPAA 2025: Essential Updates & How DataSure24 Supports Your Business
The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) has announced sweeping changes to HIPAA regulations, transforming what were once flexible guidelines into concrete mandates. These HIPAA 2025 updates will reshape how healthcare organizations protect electronic protected health information (ePHI). For healthcare providers, medical billing companies, and their technology partners, these new mandatory requirements present both challenges and opportunities to strengthen their security posture. Understanding these changes now allows organizations to prepare effectively for what’s ahead. Key HIPAA 2025 Updates You Need to Know The new regulations introduce fundamental changes that every healthcare organization must understand and implement: These changes mark a significant shift in HIPAA’s approach to security. Where organizations once had flexibility in how they met security objectives, the new regulations mandate specific security measures without exception. This uniform approach ensures all healthcare entities maintain consistent security standards. The shift to mandatory requirements means organizations can no longer choose alternative security approaches or document why certain measures don’t apply to their situation. Every covered entity must implement the same security measures, creating a level playing field across the healthcare industry. Enhanced Cybersecurity Requirements HIPAA 2025 introduces specific cybersecurity mandates that will transform how organizations protect patient data: These enhanced requirements recognize the evolving threat landscape facing healthcare organizations. The mandate for twice-yearly vulnerability scans ensures organizations identify and address security gaps regularly. Annual penetration testing provides validation that security measures work effectively against real-world attack scenarios. The anti-malware requirement extends to all systems handling ePHI, not just traditional computers. This comprehensive approach ensures protection across the entire technology infrastructure, from servers to workstations to mobile devices used in patient care. Regular assessment requirements mean organizations must budget for ongoing security evaluations rather than treating them as one-time expenses. This shift from periodic to continuous security validation represents a fundamental change in how healthcare organizations must approach cybersecurity. Strengthening Resilience & Incident Response The new regulations emphasize organizational resilience through specific planning requirements: These requirements acknowledge that incidents may occur despite preventive measures. Organizations must prepare for potential disruptions by developing comprehensive plans that address various scenarios. The emphasis on testing ensures plans work when needed most. Business continuity planning under HIPAA 2025 requires more than just backing up data. Organizations must ensure they can maintain operations and protect patient information during and after incidents. This includes planning for system failures, natural disasters, and cyber attacks. The requirement for regular updates recognizes that organizations change over time. New systems, processes, and threats mean yesterday’s plans may not work tomorrow. Regular reviews and updates ensure plans remain relevant and effective. Important Dates & Next Steps Healthcare organizations must pay attention to these key milestones in the HIPAA 2025 implementation timeline: These dates represent important milestones in the regulatory process. The Tribal Consultation Meeting ensures tribal healthcare organizations have input into the final regulations. The public comment period allows all stakeholders to provide feedback on proposed rules. While the final rule and compliance deadline remain unannounced, organizations should begin preparation immediately. Waiting for final deadlines risks rushed implementation and potential non-compliance. Practical Steps for Immediate Action Healthcare organizations can’t afford to wait for final regulations before beginning preparation. Several steps can start immediately to ensure readiness for HIPAA 2025 requirements. First, assess current security measures against known HIPAA 2025 requirements. Understanding where your organization stands today helps identify gaps that need addressing. This assessment should cover technical controls, policies, procedures, and staff training. Second, begin budgeting for enhanced security measures. Twice-yearly vulnerability scanning and annual penetration testing represent new recurring expenses. Planning for these costs now prevents budget surprises later. Third, evaluate your current security partnerships. HIPAA 2025’s requirements demand expertise in both healthcare and cybersecurity. Ensure your technology partners understand healthcare compliance requirements and can support your compliance journey. Fourth, start developing or updating disaster recovery and business continuity plans. These documents take time to create properly and require input from multiple departments. Beginning now allows thoughtful development rather than rushed creation. DataSure24: Your Partner in HIPAA Compliance Ensure your healthcare clients are prepared for HIPAA 2025. Partner with DataSure24 for compliance-driven security solutions that address all new requirements. Our packaged services include everything needed for HIPAA 2025 compliance. Penetration and vulnerability testing services meet the new bi-annual and annual testing requirements. Our risk assessment and compliance audit services help identify and address gaps before they become compliance issues. Cyber threat protection and incident response services ensure organizations can detect and respond to security incidents effectively. Security awareness training helps create a culture of security throughout the organization. Our HIPAA Security Rule compliance expertise ensures all requirements are met properly. DataSure24 understands both the technical and regulatory aspects of healthcare security. We work with healthcare organizations to implement practical solutions that meet compliance requirements while supporting patient care objectives. Stay Ahead of HIPAA Changes HIPAA 2025 represents significant changes in healthcare security requirements. The shift to mandatory security standards, enhanced cybersecurity requirements, and strengthened resilience planning will impact every healthcare organization. Success requires starting preparation now rather than waiting for final deadlines. Organizations that begin early will have time to implement changes properly, spread costs over time, and ensure staff are trained on new requirements. The question isn’t whether these changes are coming—they are. The question is whether your organization will be ready when compliance becomes mandatory. Let us help you stay compliant, secure, and ahead of the curve. DataSure24 provides the expertise, services, and support needed to meet HIPAA 2025 requirements successfully. Contact DataSure24 today to build a compliant and secure future for your clients. Reach us at info@datasure24.com or call 716-600-3724 / 407-494-2885. Don’t wait until deadlines approach. Start your HIPAA 2025 compliance journey today with DataSure24 as your trusted partner. Posted by Mark Musone
A Managed Security Service Provider’s Day on the Front Lines of the Cybersecurity Battlefield
Did you ever wonder what it’s like to work on the front lines of the cybersecurity battlefield …. what the war room looks like … how battle cries and alarms are sounded … how troops are mobilized and dispatched to take on enemies at the gates and on the walls? In my last post, I discussed the differences between Managed Service Providers (MSP) and a Managed Security Service Provider (MSSP). I hope that I’ve made a compelling case for why your company or organization may need both. In this post, I do a deeper dive to take you behind the scenes of a typical day in the life of a MSSP Cybersecurity Analyst to bring those differences to life in a vivid way. Inside the Managed Security Service Provider Control Center … an Alarm Goes Off Imagine, if you will, a team of contracted Tier 1 SOC Analysts sitting at their workstation, surrounded by monitors tracking internal and external movements within your IT network, when an alarm goes off that’s an indication of mischief. Immediately, the Analyst will log the alarm, use their training to do an assessment of the criticality of the alarm using a 15-step checklist to determine if a quick and aggressive response and remediation is warranted. To provide some perspective, DataSure24 sees about 150 alerts per day per Analyst over the entire scope of clients we are monitoring. Within 10 minutes, the alarm will be deemed either harmless or harmful, and if the latter, escalated immediately to our Tier 2 SOC Analyst. If it’s relatively harmless, the incident is still tracked but not treated with same urgency. Later that Morning at the Desk of the Tier 2 SOC Analyst On an average month, we see about 18,000 alarms and of those, about one out of every 100 of alarms gets escalated to a Tier 2 SOC Analyst. Within minutes, that Analyst will initiate a significantly deeper investigation, using our proprietary predictive algorithms, research, team discussions, and instinct to identify the exact nature of the intrusion and best possible responses. Companies that use an MSSP will generally have a previously developed Cybersecurity Response and Remediation Planning which is then put into play. That plan is executed coolly, professionally and swiftly by the SOC 2 Analysts in conjunction with the client’s IT team. On average, once an alarm has been escalated to a Tier 2 Analyst, the time from assessment to response and remediation is less than an hour. A Managed Security Service Provider’s Response to a Zero Day Attack Three to five times a year, every company may experience a Zero Day Attack launched by hackers and cybercriminals. The term “zero-day” refers to a newly discovered software vulnerability. Because the developer has just learned of the flaw, it also means an official patch or update to fix the issue hasn’t been released. So, “zero-day” refers to the fact that the developers have “zero days” to fix the problem that has just been exposed — and perhaps already exploited by hackers. Once the vulnerability becomes publicly known, the vendor has to work quickly to fix the issue to protect its users. But the software vendor may fail to release a patch before hackers manage to exploit the security hole. That’s known as a zero-day attack. If a zero-day attack is detected via monitoring by a Tier 1 Analyst, escalation takes on a sense of greater urgency and requires greater speed before what may be a small breech turns into a major headache, resource drain, financial loss, and reputation damage. While neither a Tier 1 or Tier 2 Analyst can patch the weakness, they can put a pre-determined Incident Response Plan into effect, and work with the client’s IT team to isolate, protect or even shut down critical servers and other hardware. As you might imagine, it’s a bit more hectic and stressful both in our Mission Control room and at the client’s site when zero-day attacks occur, but teamwork and professionalism generally go a long way to short circuit an attack of this type before a software patch is applied. The human element in place, always monitoring, can be the difference between a catastrophe and a ‘dodged a bullet’ scenario. Later That Day, It’s Time to Catch Up on a Few Reports and Do a Vulnerability Scan or Two A day in the life of a DataSure24 Tier 1 or 2 SOC analyst is a lot more than just sitting around, drinking coffee and waiting for an alarm to ping! They’re also preparing and delivering monthly reports to clients showcasing alarms caught and resolved, actions taken regarding elevated alarms and responses, zero-day attack incidents, and news or updates from the world of cybersecurity that merit a watchful eye. There are also specialists hard at work doing contracted vulnerability scanning work, trying to identify and exploit security weaknesses, including phishing employees to determine their levels of awareness and compliance with company IT security policies. Generally, these network vulnerability scans reveal hundreds of vulnerabilities, most of which are easily resolved, but it some cases a significant vulnerability will be discovered or a trend indicating a security lapse identified. At that point, Network Vulnerability Analysts and other members of the MSSP team will develop a plan and identify resources that should be directed to executing remediation strategies, policies or actions. Our team is always looking for ways to improve ourselves, from upgrading our technologies to continued and consistent training in our specialized environment. Staying globally aware of Cybersecurity current events is a linchpin of our daily routine. Meanwhile, On Your Calendar of Daily Activities I hope that this brief overview into the life of a Cybersecurity Analysts provides the additional insight and guidance you need to make an investment in MSSP services happen. At a minimum, 24/7/365 cybersecurity monitoring has become a “must” and a necessary part of doing business. Does your company have the right cybersecurity plan in place? Contact us for more information on how our customizable services may help